Terkko Navigator / American Journal of Bioethics

Can the Principles of Research Ethics Help Us Distribute Clinical Resources More Fairly?

Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection

Context is Needed When Assessing Fair Subject Selection

Upstream Influences and Fair Subject Selection

Redistributing Fair Subject Selection

Fair Inclusion and the Pursuit of Robustly Generalizable Clinically Relevant Knowledge

Risk Limits in Fair Subject Selection

Fair Subject Selection Procedures Must Consider Scientific Uncertainty and Variability in Risk and Benefit Perception

The Challenge of Selecting Participants Fairly in High-Demand Clinical Trials

Clinical Research Subject Selection during Public Health Disasters: Reconceptualizing Fairness in a Global Ethical Context

The Fifth Face of Fair Subject Selection: Population Grouping

Marginally Represented Patients and the Moral Authority of Surrogates

Addressing the Perceived Duality of Represented and Unrepresented Patients: Legal Findings in a Moral Context

Decisional Humility and the Marginally Represented Patient

From Solo Decision Maker to Multi-Stakeholder Process: A Defense and Recommendations

Compassionate Care for the Unconscious and Incapacitated

Marginally Represented Patients, Best Interests, and Ends-in-Themselves

Epistemic Burdens, Moral Intimacy, and Surrogate Decision Making

Bolstering Surrogate Decision Making for Marginally Represented and Unrepresented Patients: One System’s Approach and Experience

On Surrogates’ Moral Authority: A Reply to Berger

Moral Intimacy, Authority, and Discretion

Frontiers in Bioethics

Randomized Trials are Deeply Offensive

Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Pragmatic Clinical Trial-Collateral Findings: Recognizing the Needs of Low-Resource Research Participants

Collateral Findings from Pragmatic Clinical Trials: What Responsibility Do We Have to Enrolled and Future Patients?

Partial Entrustment in Pragmatic Clinical Trials

The Collateral Finding of What?

Human Subjects Research Without Consent: Duties to Return Individual Findings When Participation was Non-Consensual

Misrepresenting“Usual Care” in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error

Improving Comparative Effectiveness Trials

What Research Ethics (Often) Gets Wrong about Minimal Risk

“Unusual Care”: Groupthink and Willful Blindness in the SUPPORT Study

It Does Not Matter Whether Research Interventions Are Usual Care

The CER Experiment

From Epistemic Trespassing to Transdisciplinary Cooperation: The Role of Expertise in the Identification of Usual Care

Traditional, Not the Usual: On Misrepresenting Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network Lower Tidal Volume Trial (ARMA)

The Importance of Describing as Well as Defining Usual Care

Misuse of“Usual Care” in Emergency Care Research: A Call for Adapting Rules Governing Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) Studies

Re-envisioning“Doing Everything” for an Infant with Trisomy 18

Let It Be: The Evolving Standard of Care for Trisomy 18

You Can’t Always Get What You Want… We Will Help You Get What You Need

Ethics and the Importance of Good Clinical Practices

Diverting Opioid Diversion: Does It Justify Randomly Screening Palliative Care Patients?

Getting Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg: Suspected Opioid Diversion

Drug Testing Is No Substitute for Honesty or Addiction Risk Reduction

You’re in…But This Service Requires Drug Testing

Is It Time to Rethink Health Care Ethics?

Letter to the Editor: The Necessity of Teaching Medical Students to Voice Their Values

Response to Open Peer Commentaries“Taxonomizing Views of Clinical Ethics Expertise”